auf dem zettel steht: gin lubuski

yochai benkler, the wealth of networks

internet of things

revisited:

Diversity plus freedom of choice creates inequality, and the greater the diversity, the more extreme the inequality.| shirky

the long tail

there are some search engines with purpose out there. ie: theyworkforyou

a non-partisan, volunteer-run website which aims to make it easy for people to keep tabs on their elected and unelected representatives in Parliament.

or credo: CREDO groups the results of a web search (currently Yahoo! search results) in a lattice of conceptual clusters that highlight the contents of the retrieved documents. | pointers provided by dag elgesem

sounds expensive to me. google checkout system on duty mañana hoy, they say.

collected #news

y+g sitemap corp.

This study, while certainly far from exhaustive, does provide a snapshot of the performance of different search engines at the end of 2005. Undoubtedly the most striking result is the very low level of user satisfaction. For the best search engines (Yahoo, Google), the average grade on the first screen of 10 results barely reaches 2.3 on a scale of 0 to 5. The proportion of off-topic results is high, since it accounts for practically half of all results for some search engines and one fifth for Yahoo, the best-performing search engine under this criterion. comparative study of six search engines, j.véronis | via dirk lewandowski thanks.

no quality reason found why people prefer google as yahoo is as good when it comes to relevance.

quaero: or when dt & fr play europa. no other interest reported so far.