just because there isn't such thing doesn't mean you can't have a word to describe it.

unicorn cyberwar

just because the word has a specific meaning to many doesn't mean it can't be used in a different context (aside of different groups)

public as in public procurement versus public at large enhanced cooperation (decision by few, not many) transparent proxy: we don't tell you where we send you ...

it's about people, it's about knowing where the data comes from, it's about questioning: again nothing new, but repeating circles. recalling first military simulations done by number crunchers. is there a way to move on, please?¿

"...That we are all sitting here today with one of the biggest technologies that we've invented, and were using it to solve trivialities. We use it to solve advertising problems, hypothetical data scientist pulling down information about a childrens breakfast cereal, measuring and constructing data to build models to determine the exact color of the packaging, the position on the shelf, and how much money we should charge for it. (sean gurley (01:58) | structure:data conference 2013

"Since you can't connect dots you don't have, it drives us into a mode of, we fundamentally try to collect everything and hang on to it forever." (hunt) | cia chews everything

some times one has to wonder what kind of stats are out there: bureau of labor statistics | us