motz |
dijous, 28. d’octubre 2004
getting somewhere? motzes, 28.10.2004 20:23h
What convinced holdouts of Newton's theory of gravitation? According to Lakatos, it was Edmund Halley's successful prediction (to within a minute) of the return date of the comet that now bears his name. What tipped scientific opinion toward Einstein's theory of general relativity? The famous experiment in which the bending of light was observed during a solar eclipse. What's the equivalent in software development? ... Comment
tobi, 29/10/04 13:01
but it all took ages
and it was by all means necessary. what's the equivalent to software development, anyway? ... Link
motzes, 29/10/04 13:17
up and running again ;) well, brian marick quotes first this other guy saying: 'scientific wins are not just a matter of avoiding experimental refutation' to go on with a sort of answer to the question: To grab mindshare, methodologists should use a surprising method to achieve unexpected success with a long-intractable problem. ;) any help, i don't know, want to rethink his txt. ... link
tobi, 29/10/04 15:31
conviction
is hardly a matter of ideas even in the scientific world. i could recommend reading a litte bit in bill bryson's short history of nearly everything (as i do right now) and you might find a lot of historical proof of how outlandish (or, if you prefer the term, funny) scientific people cope with new discoveries in their field. in a broader (or more technical) sense i could remind you of the dvorak keyboard story and its sibling anecdotes. and since software developers are kind of technical-, kind of scientific-oriented people (imho), i guess they have to cope with exactly the same problem: the ineradicable misbeliefs and superstitions as well as the nonsenseness of many social and political ecologies. (but then again, they do not even bring to us grand unification equations or the answer to life, the universe and everything.) so let's make shitty software and join in for a larf! ... link
motzes, 29/10/04 16:30
about the dvorak keyboard i am not so sure. i also couldn't find this paper (btw. written by señor dvorak himself), that always gets quoted as a proof of superiority. i think marick's example tells more: maxwell vs rutherford's model of the atom. and mathematicians anyhow like to tell everyone who stands near by that they know the truth and have an answer to life and for sure the right equation for everything by hand. proofed truth so to say. until the next chap shows up ... ... link ... Comment |
Online for 8663 days
Last update: 3/11/23 17:00 status
Youre not logged in ... Login
menu
search
calendar
recent updates
human "The mind is what
the brain does." (margaret boden) Mind As Machine. A History...
by motzes (3/11/23 17:00)
holography explained it has been
20 years since i met nils abramson and heard about...
by motzes (20/2/22 10:22)
digital dilemma as seen in
the year 2000 . Intellectual Property in the Information Age...
by motzes (28/1/22 8:56)
anti colonial connectivity "... it
was after all, the early days of Intelsat, when having...
by motzes (16/8/21 11:20)
old stories revisited ... ...
makes one search again, along the lines given. brought me...
by motzes (6/7/21 14:27)
history writing gerade
im ohr: ein interview mit verkühlter stimme. aufnahmedatum: 2016.
by motzes (30/3/20 15:42)
Nice Thanks for uploading this.
It's an amazing window on the early history of interactive...
by Kayla (1/3/20 15:51)
gibberjabber interesting, die eingefangenen bots
werden in ihrer wortwahl aggressiv.
by motzes (26/10/19 20:41)
rätsel Daniel Schwenter, Philosophischen und
Mathematischen Erquickstunden, Dritter Theil, 1653 | https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_bGM_AAAAcAAJ
by motzes (22/10/19 19:06)
|