motz |
dissabte, 23. de març 2002
cbdtpa, aka sssa motzes, 23.03.2002 18:13h
with greetings from the motion picture association and the recording industry association of america: the "consumer broadband and digital television promotion act" (cbdtpa) former called: "security systems standards and certification act" (sssca) was introduced to the us-senate two days ago. to protect consumers to end up in prison - as they suggest in the new law - no electronic device should be sold without copy-protection. ¿also the refrigerator, microwave and what ever the industrie is dreaming about? however, its lovely to read what the us-congress thinks is wrong with the internet. the congress finds: (1) The lack of high quality digital content continues to hinder consumer adoption of broadband Internet service and digital television products. (2) Owners of digital programming and content are increasingly reluctant to transmit their products unless digital media devices incorporate technologies that recognize and respond to content security measures designed to prevent theft. (3) Because digital content can be copied quickly, easily, and without degradation, digital programming and content owners face an exponentially increasing piracy threat in a digital age. (4) Current agreements reached in the marketplace to include security technologies in certain digital media devices fail to provide a secure digital environment because those agreements do not prevent the continued use and manufacture of digital media devices that fail to incorporate such security technologies. (5) Other existing digital rights management schemes represent proprietary, partial solutions that limit, rather than promote, consumers' access to the greatest variety of digital content possible. (6) Technological solutions can be developed to protect digital content on digital broadcast television and over the Internet. (7) Competing business interests have frustrated agreement on the deployment of existing technology in digital media devices to protect digital content on the Internet or on digital broadcast television. (8) The secure protection of digital content is a necessary precondition to the dissemination, and on-line availability, of high quality digital content, which will benefit consumers and lead to the rapid growth of broadband networks. (9) The secure protection of digital content is a necessary precondition to facilitating and has- tening the transition to high-definition television, which will benefit consumers. (10) Today, cable and satellite have a competitive advantage over digital television because the closed nature of cable and satellite systems permit encryption, which provides some protection for digital content. (11) Over-the-air broadcasts of digital television are not encrypted for public policy reasons and thus lack protections afforded to programming delivered via cable or satellite. (12) A solution to this problem is technologically feasible but will require government action, including a mandate to ensure its swift and ubiquitous adoption. (13) Consumers receive content such as video or programming in analog form. (14) When protected digital content is converted to analog for consumers, it is no longer protected and is subject to conversion into unprotected digital form that can in turn be copied or redistribute illegally. (15) As solution to this problem is technologically feasible but will require government action, including a mandate to ensure its swift and ubiquitous adoption. (16) Unprotected digital content on the Internet is subject to significant piracy, through illegal file sharing, downloading, and redistribution over the Internet. (17) Millions of Americans are currently downloading television programs, movies, and music on the Internet and by using "file-sharing" technology. Much of this activity is illegal, but demonstrates consumers's desire to access digital content. (18) Piracy poses a substantial economic threat to America's content industries. (19) A solution to this problem is technologically feasible but will require government action, including a mandate to ensure its swift and ubiquitous adoption. (20) Providing a secure, protected environment for digital content should be accompanied by a preservation of legitimate consumer expectations regarding use of digital content in the home. (21) Secure technological protections should enable owners to disseminate digital content over the Internet without frustrating consumers' legitimate expectations to use that content in a legal manner. (22) Technologies used to protect digital content should facilitate legitimate home use of digital content. (23) Technologies used to protect digital content should facilitate individuals' ability to engage in legitimate use of digital content for educational or research purposes. ... Comment |
Online for 8549 days
Last update: 3/11/23 17:00 status
Youre not logged in ... Login
menu
search
calendar
recent updates
human "The mind is what
the brain does." (margaret boden) Mind As Machine. A History...
by motzes (3/11/23 17:00)
holography explained it has been
20 years since i met nils abramson and heard about...
by motzes (20/2/22 10:22)
digital dilemma as seen in
the year 2000 . Intellectual Property in the Information Age...
by motzes (28/1/22 8:56)
anti colonial connectivity "... it
was after all, the early days of Intelsat, when having...
by motzes (16/8/21 11:20)
old stories revisited ... ...
makes one search again, along the lines given. brought me...
by motzes (6/7/21 14:27)
history writing gerade
im ohr: ein interview mit verkühlter stimme. aufnahmedatum: 2016.
by motzes (30/3/20 15:42)
Nice Thanks for uploading this.
It's an amazing window on the early history of interactive...
by Kayla (1/3/20 15:51)
gibberjabber interesting, die eingefangenen bots
werden in ihrer wortwahl aggressiv.
by motzes (26/10/19 20:41)
rätsel Daniel Schwenter, Philosophischen und
Mathematischen Erquickstunden, Dritter Theil, 1653 | https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_bGM_AAAAcAAJ
by motzes (22/10/19 19:06)
|