i can't deny, i like that shit. not that i understand what they are actually trying to tell me when they speak about ultracold atoms or the atomic hanbury-brown and twiss effect. i can look it up, but i prefer the fleshy edition of wikipedia instead. and as caslav brukner and zeilinger did the work, there is a chance that wants to be used. just to suck it in, not bordering if what is said belongs to this or that school, is proper or not. as in my case it doesn't matter. i don't want to proof anything. at the moment i don't care about questions alike: how many versions of the same sentence exist and how many interpretations. i take the sentence, thanks, go back to my corner and chew on it. brainfood at its best, especially as i just feed myself with thoughts on information and knowledge. harvesting for future use. hah. what a luxury.

yet as time is a scarcity i still hope to get my hand on the documentation, need to read more of shimon malin, who speaks with such speed that to follow him is simply impossible; even the standby text version didn't help too much; but he left the message: read me.

who has time: there will be a public lecture on friday night at the academy of science: paul davis: how to build a time machine.

personally i would be happy to find a way to divide my presence.