why?

do a real world prog in it once and you'll knows why.

i decided a long time ago to stay meta, and as i know by now it's a luxury i will keep it that way. here you go: abstracting without fear of draggling my fingers. oh yeah.

then all we are saying, is to give abstraction a chance. Then you're bound to believe what people you trust say about execution.

sure, but i test them to hell before i trust them and as dave thomas once said: "the easiest question is the hardest". adele had another line for that. also, not everyone has the ability to pass that test. don't worry, but sometimes i have to test tricky waters and my neurons. call it curiousity ...

abstraction? funny that you mention it. i am somehow chewing on: "abstraction is ingnorance". i have examples where it fits, others were it doesn't at all. and that water - for sure - is too tricky for me right now. but it's in my head and will stick there for a while ...

thats's a male/female thing. I've ordered Spencer-Browns book on "gaming only possible 4 2". we'll find out before we leave this universe, i'm sure.

¿really? you want to go away with a boy&girl thing here? travelling with the mariazeller-bahn today, i tend to say: nah. the stuff that went on in this little cabin was really complex. no ease of gender.

i know u never want to know this. It's also an eye/ear thing and a write/speak thing and a dao thing and a feel/reflect thing and an intuition/reason thing and a know/do thing which in turn are all m/f things, cause that is how they are coded in our respective cultures.

it's maybe time to chance/peril the code, no?. but i fear your are pretty mulish in regard to f[m-b]g.