motz |
... Previous page
dissabte, 12. de gener 2008
aviation sec motzes, 12.01.2008 15:09h
Americans can now pay to have their personal information put on file just to avoid the hassle of airport security. As cynical as George Orwell ever was, I doubt he imagined the idea of citizens offering up money for their own subjugation. | nyt via schneier belt: i don't know why someone should take it off. a fellow traveller told me he never does and goes through with the line: look it's so small and fragile and i am an old man, it would take me hours to fiddle it in again. i mean if you can give me a hand? ... it doesn't need more. berlin, germany: after all those years they haven't learned to identify a microphone. hardly happens at other airports in europe anymore. one thing that needs to be proofed: the more bureaucrats are in town the less are controls. try geneva airport. laptop screening: the only time they did this to me was - yes - in berlin. guess the rule just got implemented at the time and i was a statistical pick; thank's for cleaning my response, as i didn't know what they wanted before i entered their baby-bottle-screening-room. seems to be outdated today. there is no reason not to question their behaviour, as they need to make a choice between: how long will it take and 50% probability of being of danger. as they are observed too they can get into trouble by being too picky. beside of "we let them get through with it" it's worth to consider: they won't be able to identify a bomb, because they hardly get to see one in their training. they simply don't have comparable picts because they don't know what they should look for. one of many reasons why they go after toothpaste and lipsticks who happened not to be in a bag. the latter is history by now. a lot is speculation and if you have bad luck, they simply don't like your nose or pick you because they feel secure that you won't cause them troubles to fullfill their statistics. the last instance for going on board are not these people at the screening device. if you protest against their treatment they have to call a represantative of the airline in the end who has to decide how the story will end. i never tried it out by myself, as i never book a flight by having a lot of time to play around, but that's what i was told and would make sense to do. ... Link (5 comments) ... Comment let them play motzes, 12.01.2008 14:00h
when the sea plays the pipe ... field recordings and installations by jeff talman ie snow, endless columns, curved space, ... It’s a form of “stopping the world. | nmr ... Link (0 comments) ... Comment divendres, 11. de gener 2008
voting machinery motzes, 11.01.2008 17:27h
hacking democracy, part 9 from 9 | thanks p3k for the pointer! consider new hampshire what is this: wu meets voting? ... ... Link (0 comments) ... Comment ... Next page
|
Online for 8549 days
Last update: 3/11/23 17:00 status
Youre not logged in ... Login
menu
search
calendar
recent updates
human "The mind is what
the brain does." (margaret boden) Mind As Machine. A History...
by motzes (3/11/23 17:00)
holography explained it has been
20 years since i met nils abramson and heard about...
by motzes (20/2/22 10:22)
digital dilemma as seen in
the year 2000 . Intellectual Property in the Information Age...
by motzes (28/1/22 8:56)
anti colonial connectivity "... it
was after all, the early days of Intelsat, when having...
by motzes (16/8/21 11:20)
old stories revisited ... ...
makes one search again, along the lines given. brought me...
by motzes (6/7/21 14:27)
history writing gerade
im ohr: ein interview mit verkühlter stimme. aufnahmedatum: 2016.
by motzes (30/3/20 15:42)
Nice Thanks for uploading this.
It's an amazing window on the early history of interactive...
by Kayla (1/3/20 15:51)
gibberjabber interesting, die eingefangenen bots
werden in ihrer wortwahl aggressiv.
by motzes (26/10/19 20:41)
rätsel Daniel Schwenter, Philosophischen und
Mathematischen Erquickstunden, Dritter Theil, 1653 | https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_bGM_AAAAcAAJ
by motzes (22/10/19 19:06)
|