interesting draft on patents and open standards. including a collection of materials on ibm´s patent claim on e(lectronic) b(usiness)XML, but also older cases.

there is a quote from simon phipps about the case. he should know what he is talking about and propably a little bit more: some years ago he was chief xml evangelist" by ibm. nowadays he is working by sun and talking about phipps law (proprietary solutions are costly, shared standards make the value grow faster than the costs.)

"Simon Phipps, chief technology evangelist at Sun Microsystems Inc., called the move 'the renaissance of the old IBM.' He said actions like this 'raise questions about the entire standards process.' Phipps argued that companies like IBM with large patent portfolios could hijack anything claiming to be an open standard by waiting for adoption and then asserting their rights. 'It lets you have a degree of control over your competitors and how they compete with you,' he said..."

in general

"Business leaders have an opportunity and obligation to think beyond the Dogma of Pure Materialism which some appear to accept as an unqualified moral charge: "to maximize corporate profits and shareholder dividends without regard for the long-term concerns of humanity worldwide." One need not be a socialist or communist to recognize that a form of Capitalist Religion which deifies corporate profit and ignores long-term consequences for society is a bankrupt religion as well as a morally deficient personal agenda."

material for storytelling: topic maps. wondering if these guys can change my mind. looking forward to listen to michel biezunski o rick jelliffe, ... at coming up xml-event

rick jelliffe vision is - as far as i got it - "vision of a plurality of schema languages, a schema language without any elements." he wrote schematon. another example of this vision is named examplotron from eric van der vlist. "The purpose of examplotron is to use instance documents as a lightweight schema language-- eventually adding the information needed to guide a validator in the sample documents."

kottke on organizing the info glut. hmhm. some of the comments are interesting.

personally i don´t believe in the semantic web nor in standardizing tags or categories in weblogs - as a principle. i don´t like the notion of standardized thoughts.