when colleagues think they have to rewrite and don't accept authorship. i am thankful, when someone corrects mistakes in the typo or structure of a sentence, but if their work means: adding things without being correct, halftrue and just added for being mentioned it sucks. short useless and in some way false remarks can destroy a story completely and make every work and research in the end useless. it hides those things that are new and interesting in my view.

it is not my way of doing journalism and i don't feel like writing anything anymore for the futurezone if it ends like that. if they don't like it, they shouldn't bring it online, that would be correct. there are a lot of different ways and angels to a story, but that notion of rewriting without permission has the taste of fellner news and not what i understand under professional work. gone and dead. goodbye.